Biblical archaeology
Biblical archaeology involves the recovery and scientific investigation of the material remains of past cultures that can illuminate the period described in the Bible. As with the historical records from any other civilization, the manuscripts must be compared to other accounts from contemporary societies in Europe, Mesopotamia, and Africa; additionally, records from neighbors must be compared with them. The scientific techniques employed are those of archaeology in general including excavations as well as chance discoveries.
By contrast Near Eastern archaeology is simply the archaeology of the Ancient Near East without any particular consideration of how its discoveries relate to the Bible.
Biblical archaeology is a controversial subject with differing opinions on what its purpose and goals are or should be. Professional opinions of Biblical archaeology have been set aside in a separate commentary section.
| Contents |
Biblical texts
Charles Warren conducted the first formal excavations in the Holy Land under the auspices of the Palestine Exploration Fund in 1867, a time when the oldest complete Hebrew scripture only dated to the Middle Ages. Warren discovered the first Israelite inscriptions on several jar handles with LMLK seals found near the southeast wall of the Temple in Jerusalem.
The Dead Sea Scrolls, discovered shortly before Israel gained statehood in 1948, and other ancient copies of the Bible manuscripts do not qualify as artifacts representing something mentioned in the Bible, although they are an important testimony to the antiquity of the texts, and the reliable manner in which they were preserved through the centuries. The first seven scrolls had initially appeared on the antiquities market, but when their enormous importance was recognized, archaeologists eventually found their source in a series of caves above the Dead Sea, and subsequent searches located thousands of similar fragments.
The famous silver scrolls discovered in 1979 at Ketef Hinnom uniquely preserve Biblical texts dating to at least the 6th century BCE, possibly decades before the Jews were exiled to Babylon, thus disproving some theories of later Torah composition. Both of these amulets contain the Priestly blessing from the book of Numbers; one also contains a quote found in parallel verses of Exodus (20:6) and Deuteronomy (5:10 and 7:9). The same verses appear again even later in the book of Daniel (9:4) and Nehemiah (1:5).
Confirmed Biblical structures
- Gibeon pool (at el-Jib)
- Jericho's walls
- Critics claim they fell due to an earthquake and do not date to the time of Joshua's conquest; nonetheless, it is a remarkable coincidence that they exist at all considering that the site was stratified and unoccupied during the late period when the critics say the book of Joshua was written.
- Lachish siege ramp of Sennacherib
- Second Temple (confirmed by Western/Wailing wall constructed by Herod)
- 19 tumuli located west of Jerusalem, undoubtedly dating to the Judean monarchy, but possibly representing sites of memorial ceremonies for the kings as mentioned in 2 Chronicles 16:14, 21:19, 32:33, and the book of Jeremiah 34:5
Artifacts from documented excavations
- Arad ostraca (#18 mentions the Temple in Jerusalem)
- Balaam texts (ink/paint on plaster found at Deir 'Alla in Jordan that parallels the book of Numbers chapters 22-24)
- Gemariah the son of Shaphan seal impression stamped on bulla
- Jar handles inscribed GBON (recovered from the Gibeon pool)
- Tel Dan Stele with House of David inscription (three fragments discovered in 1993)
- Lachish reliefs from Sennacherib's palace at Nineveh (depicting his conquest of it)
- Merneptah stela (Egyptian reference to Israelites in the land of Canaan)
Artifacts with unknown, disputed, or disproved provenance
Items in this list mostly come from private collections via the antiquities market, but also from chance finds prior to the establishment of antiquities laws. Their authenticity is highly controversial and in some cases has been demonstrated to be fraudulent.
- Ark of the Covenant
- The Ethiopian Orthodox Church in Axum, Ethiopia claims to possess it; local tradition maintains that it was brought to Ethiopia by Menelik I following a visit to his father King Solomon.
- Ebla (Tell Mardikh) cuneiform archives
- They reportedly contain references to the same five cities mentioned in the book of Genesis: Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboim, and Bela/Zoar in the same order as in Genesis 14. Also reported are references to people with Semitic names and gods similar to those in the Bible. They include a king of Ebla named Ebrum, who some identify as the Biblical patriarch Eber (or Heber), after whom the Hebrews were named. The government of Syria continues to withhold complete publication of the texts, and this story remains a rumor.
- Artifacts originating from the antiquities dealer, Oded Golan. In December 2004 he was indicted by the Israeli police, together with several accomplices, for forging the following artifacts:
- The James Ossuary inscribed James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus suspected of being forged on a genuine ancient ossuary.
- The Joash (Jehoash) tablet recording repairs to the Temple in Jerusalem suspected of being forged on a genuine ancient stone panel.
- Various ostraca mentioning the Temple or place names from the Bible.
- A seven-nozzle stone lamp, bearing decorations of a Temple menorah and the seven species
- A stone seal with gold rim, attributed to King Manasseh of Judah.
- A quartz bowl bearing an inscription in ancient Egyptian, indicating that the Minister of the Army of King Shishek conquered the ancient city of Meggido.
- An ivory pomegranate inscribed Property of the priests of the temple… forged on a genuine ancient piece of ivory.
- A pottery jug bearing an inscription claiming that it was given as a contribution to the Temple.
- Numerous bullae including ones which mention Biblical figures including King Hezekiah of Judah, the scribe Baruch and the prophet Isaiah.
- Nazareth Inscription
- Marble tablet with "Edict of Caesar" proscribing capital punishment for tomb-breakers, datable to the first century A.D., and allegedly acquired by the Frohner Collection in 1878 from Nazareth.
- The remains of Noah's Ark have been allegedly located by a number of archaeological groups and individuals. Most academics discount their findings as pseudoarchaeology.
- Archaeologist Ron Wyatt claimed to have possibly located the Ark's final resting place. Since his death he has been acclaimed by many Bible believers. A plethora of internet sites concerning him have come into existence, and some have fabricated information about him and his discoveries.
- An Italian archaeological group named La Narkas is the most recent of numerous groups claiming to have pinpointed the location of Noah's Ark close to the top of Mount Ararat, which straddles the border of Turkey and Armenia. Photographs of this alleged discovery are available on their website [1].
- In 2004, yet another expedition went to Mount Ararat in Turkey to try to locate the Ark. Samples from Turkey tested by Geological and Nuclear Sciences, a New Zealand government research institute, were found to be volcanic rock rather than petrified wood. [2]
- Shroud of Turin
- Critics claim it contains a painted image of Jesus forged in the Middle Ages; others maintain the image was formed by some heat process that darkened the fibers (such as a flash of light the instant the resurrection occurred). Radiocarbon dating seemed to limit its origin to the Middle Ages, but some analysts suggest the tests were erroneously performed using samples taken from patches sewn onto the ancient cloth during the Middle Ages, or contaminated from fires it was exposed to. If forged, it would be the most realistically accurate painting produced during the Middle Ages. If genuine, it is the most incredible artifact imaginable.
- Stone of Scone, also known as Jacob's Pillar
- For centuries, this rock has been an integral compenent of coronation ceremonies for kings in the British isles. It is believed to be the rock upon which Jacob (later renamed Israel) received a vision, and a crack in it may have resulted from Moses striking it to bring forth water. None of this can be proven, and attempts to link it to Palestine via Jeremiah lack foundation.
Professional commentary
"The purpose of Biblical archaeology is the clarification and illumination of the Biblical text and content through archaeological investigation of the Biblical world," wrote J.K. Eakins in an essay in Benchmarks in Time and Culture [3].
Bryant Wood wrote, "The purpose of Biblical archaeology is to enhance our comprehension of the Bible, and so its greatest achievement, in my view, has been the extraordinary illumination of the... time of the Israelite monarchy" (in Biblical Archaeology Review, May-June, 1995, p. 33). According to those who follow this view, the purpose of biblical archaeology is to establish the historical accuracy of Biblical texts and refute the theory that these books contain myths or legends composed by Jews exiled in Babylon during the 6th century BCE and later.
In a statement of a more nuanced opinion of Biblical archaeology, Robert I.Bradshaw notes, "It is virtually universally agreed that the purpose of biblical archaeology is not to 'prove' the Bible, however ...in as much as archaeology sheds light on that history it is important to biblical studies" [4]
The American archaeologist William Dever contributed to the article "Archaeology" in The Anchor Bible Dictionary (see Anchor Bible Series). There he assessed several negative effects of the close relationship that has existed between Syro-Palestinian archaeology and the Biblical archaeology of the Holy Land, which have especially caused American archaeologists in this field to lag behind the new "processual archaeology" in the region, generally considered: "Underlying much of the skepticism in our own field [about the adaptation of the concepts and methods of the "new archaeology"], one suspects, was the assumption (albeit unspoken, or even unconscious) that ancient Palestine, especially Israel in the biblical period, was unique—somehow 'superhistorical' not governed by the normal principles of cultural evolution," and he claims "...the 'new archaeology' of the 1970s-1980s became passé before we had even caught up with it" (p 357). Dever finds that Syro-Palestinian archaeology in American institutions has been treated as a subdiscipline of Biblical studies. American archaeologists in this region were expected to try "to provide historical validation for episodes in the biblical tradition." According to Dever, "[t]he most naïve [misconception about Syro-Palestinian archaeology] is that the rationale and purpose of "biblical archaeology" (and, by extrapolation, Syro-Palestinian archaeology) is simply to elucidate the Bible, or the lands of the Bible" ( p 358) ant304/projects/projects97/kingp/kingp.html.
See also
- Archaeology of Israel
- List of Biblical figures identified in extra-Biblical sources
- Mormon archaeology
- Pseudoarchaeology
External links
- Robert I Bradshaw, "Archaeology & the Patriarchs": introductory survey with a full bibliography of accessible material in English
- Archaeology and the Bible - Christian Answers
- Biblical Archaeology Resources - A large collection of resources relted to Biblical Archeology.
- The Biblical Archaeology Society
- The Foundation for Biblical Archaeology
- Introduction to Biblical Archaeology
- The Palestine Exploration Fund
- D.W. Wellington and N. King, University of Texas, "Archaeology of the Bible"
Further reading
- Chapman, and J.N. Tubb, Archaeology & The Bible (British Museum, 1990)
- Cornfeld, G.and D.N. Freedman, Archaeology Of The Bible Book By Book (1989)
- Dever, William G., "Archaeology and ahe Bible : understanding their special relationship", in Biblical Archaeology Review 16:3, (May/June 1990)
- Keller, Werner, The Bible as History, 1955. A widely-read popular account.
- Lance, H.D. The Old Testament and The Archaeologist. London (1983)
- Ramsey, George W. The Quest For The Historical Israel. London (1982)
- Thompson, J.A., The Bible And Archaeology, revised edition (1973)
- H.V.F. Winstone The Life of Sir Leonard Woolley of Ur, London, 1990
- Wright, G. Ernest, Biblical Archaeology. Philedelphia: Westminster, (1962).
- Yamauchi, E. The Stones And The Scriptures. London: IVP, (1973).
