Human evolution

Missing image
Evoskulls.gif



This article forms part of the series
Human Evolution
Ardipithecus
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Orrorin tugenensis
Australopithecines
Australopithecus afarensis
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus garhi
Paranthropus
Paranthropus boisei
Paranthropus robustus
Paranthropus aethiopicus
Homo
Homo habilis
Homo erectus
Homo ergaster
Homo antecessor
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo sapiens idaltu
Homo cepranensis
Homo rhodesiensis
Homo rudolfensis
Homo georgicus
Homo floresiensis
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo sapiens

Human evolution is the process of change and development, or evolution, by which human beings emerged as distinct species. It is the subject of a broad scientific inquiry that seeks to understand and describe how change and development took place. The study of human evolution encompasses many scientific disciplines, but most notably physical anthropology and genetics. The term "human", in the context of human evolution, refers to the genus Homo, but studies of human evolution usually include other hominids, such as the australopithecines.

Contents

History of paleoanthropology

The modern field of paleoanthropology is said to have begun with the discoveries of Neanderthal “man” and evidence of other "cave men" in the 19th century. The idea that humans were similar to certain great apes was obvious to people for some time, but the idea of biological evolution of species in general was not legitimized until after Charles Darwin published Origin of Species in 1859. Though Darwin's first book on evolution did not touch on the question of human evolution—"light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history," was all Darwin wrote on the subject—it was clear to contemporary readers what was at stake. Debates between Thomas Huxley and Richard Owen focused on the idea of human evolution, and by the time Darwin published his own book on the subject (Descent of Man), it was already a well-known interpretation of his theory—and the aspect of it which made it highly controversial. Even many of Darwin's original supporters (such as Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Lyell) balked at the idea that human beings could have evolved their apparently boundless mental capacities and moral sensibilities through natural selection.

Since the time of Carolus Linnaeus the great apes were ranked as being the closest animals to human beings, based on morphological similarity. In the 19th century it was speculated that our closest living relatives were chimpanzees and gorillas, and based on the natural range of these creatures, it was surmised that human ancestor fossils would ultimately be found in Africa and that humans share a common ancestor with African apes.

It was not until the 1920s that fossils other than neanderthalensis were discovered. In 1925, Raymond Dart described Australopithecus africanus. The type specimen was the Taung child, an Australopithecine infant discovered in Taung, South Africa. The remains were a remarkably well-preserved tiny skull and an endocranial cast of the individual's brain. Although the brain was small (410 cc), its shape was rounded, unlike that of chimpanzees and gorillas, more like a modern human brain. Also, the specimen exhibited short canine teeth and the position of the foramen magnum was evidence of bipedal locomotion. All these traits convinced Dart that the Taung baby was a bipedal human ancestor, a transitional form between "apes" and humans. Another 20 years would go by before Dart's claims were taken seriously, following the discovery of more fossils that resembled Dart's find. The prevailing view of the time was that a large brain evolved before bipedal locomotion. It was thought that intelligence on par with modern humans was a prerequistite to bipedalism.

The Australopithecines are now thought to be the immediate ancestors of the genus Homo, the group to which modern humans belong. Both Australopithecines and Homo are part of the family Hominidae, but recent data has brought into doubt A. Africanus position as a direct ancestor of modern humans; it may well have been a dead-end cousin. The Australopithecines were originally classified as either gracile or robust. The robust variety of Australopithecus has since been reclassified as Paranthropus. (In the 1930's when the robust specimens were first described, the Paranthropus genus was used. During the 1960s the robust variety was moved into Australopithecus. The recent trend has been back to the original classification as a separate genus.).

Human "family tree". Edit

<timeline> ImageSize = width:600 height:400 PlotArea = left:20 right:20 bottom:20 top:0 AlignBars = justify

Colors =

 id:period1  value:rgb(1,1,0.7) # light yellow
  id:period2  value:rgb(0.7,0.7,1) # light blue
  id:period3  value:rgb(0.7,1,0.7) # light green
  id:events  value:rgb(1,0.7,1) # light purple
  id:Miocene  value:rgb(1,0.8706,0) # 255/222/0
  id:Pliocene  value:rgb(0.9961,0.9216,0.6745) # 254/235/172
  id:Pleistocene  value:rgb(1,0.9216,0.3843) # 255/235/98
  id:Holocene  value:rgb(1,1,0.7020) # 255/255/179
 

Period = from:0 till:7000000 TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:1000000 start:0 ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:250000 start:0

BarData =

 bar:Timelines
  bar:Events
  bar:Buffer1
  bar:bar1
  bar:bar2
  bar:Buffer2
  bar:bar3
  bar:bar4
  bar:bar5
  bar:Buffer3
  bar:bar6
  bar:bar7
  bar:bar8
  bar:bar9
  bar:bar10
  bar:Buffer4
  bar:bar11
  bar:bar12
  bar:bar13
  bar:bar14
  bar:bar15
 

PlotData=

 width:25  mark:(line,red)  textcolor:black
 
 bar:Timelines  align:right  shift:(-75,0)
 
 bar:Timelines  align:center  shift:none
  from:5332000  till:end  color:Miocene  text:Miocene
  from:1806000  till:5332000  color:Pliocene  text:Pliocene
  from:11500  till:1806000  color:Pleistocene  text:Pleistocene
 
  1. from:0 till:11500 color:Holocene align:left text:Holocene
 bar:Events  color:events  align:right  shift:(-5,-9)
    at:5000000  text:"Split between humans and apes using molecular clock, about 5 Ma"
 
 width:11  color:events  align:right  shift:(-5,-4)
 
 bar:bar1
    from:6000000  till:7000000  color:period1
    at:6000000  text:Sahelanthropus tchadensis
  bar:bar2
    at:6000000  text:Age of Orrorin tugenensis bones found in Kenya, about 6 Ma
 
 align:left  shift:(5,-4)
 
 bar:bar3
    from:5200000  till:5800000
    at:5800000  text:Ar. kadabba
  bar:bar5
    from:4400000  till:5000000
    at:5000000  text:Ar. ramidus
 
 bar:bar6
    from:3900000  till:4200000
    at:4200000  text:A. anamensis
  bar:bar7
    from:3000000  till:3900000
    at:3900000  text:A. afarensis
  bar:bar9
    from:2000000  till:3000000
    at:3000000  text:A. africanus
  bar:bar10
    at:2500000  text:A. garhi
 
 bar:bar11
    from:1500000  till:2400000
    at:2400000  text:H. habilis
  bar:bar12  at:1800000  text:H. georgicus
  bar:bar14
    from:300000  till:1800000
    at:1800000  text:H. erectus
  bar:bar15
    from:0  till:500000
    at:500000  text:H. sapiens
 
 bar:bar4
    from:2300000  till:2600000
    at:2600000  text:P. aethiopicus
  bar:bar3
    from:1500000  till:2000000
    at:2000000  text:P. robustus
  bar:bar5
    from:1100000  till:2100000
    at:2100000  text:P. boisei
 
 width:53  align:center  mark:none
 
 bar:bar4  from:4400000  till:5800000  color:period1  text:Genus Ardipithecus
  bar:bar4  from:1100000  till:2600000  color:period1  align:right  text:Genus Paranthropus
 
 width:85
 
 bar:bar8  from:2000000  till:4200000  color:period2  text:Genus Australopithecus
  bar:bar13  from:0  till:2400000  color:period3  text:Genus Homo
 

TextData =

 pos:(29,14)
  text:"Years"
 

</timeline>

Before Homo

The Homo genus

In modern taxonomy, Homo sapiens is the only extant species of its genus, Homo. Likewise, the ongoing study of the origins of Homo sapiens often demonstrates that there were other Homo species, all of which are now extinct. While some of these other species might have been ancestors of H. sapiens, many were likely our "cousins", having speciated away from our ancestral line. There is not yet consensus as to which of these groups should count as separate species and which as subspecies of another species. In some cases this is due to the paucity of fossils, in others due to the very slight differences used to distinguish species in the Homo genus.

The word homo is simply the Latin for "person", chosen originally by Carolus Linnaeus in his classificatory system. It is often translated as "man", although this can lead to confusion, given that the English word "man" can be generic like homo, but can also specifically refer to males. Latin for "man" in the gender-specific sense is vir, cognate with "virile" and "werewolf". The word "human" is from humanus, the adjectival form of homo.

H. habilis

Lived from about 2.4 to 1.5 million years ago (MYA). H. habilis, the first species of the genus Homo, evolved in South and East Africa in the late Pliocene or early Pleistocene, 2.5–2 MYA, when it diverged from the Australopithecines. H. habilis had smaller molars and larger brains than the Australopithecines, and made tools from stone and perhaps animal bones.

Homo erectus

Lived from about 1.8 (including ergaster) or from about 1.25 (excluding ergaster) to 0.07 MYA. In the Early Pleistocene, 1.5–1 MYA, in Africa, Asia, and Europe, presumably Homo habilis evolved larger brains and made more elaborate stone tools; these differences and others are sufficient for anthropologists to classify them as a new species, H. erectus. A famous example of Homo erectus is Peking Man; others were found in Asia (notably in Indonesia), Africa, and Europe.

H. ergaster

Lived from about 1.8 to about 1.25 MYA. Also proposed as Homo erectus ergaster

Homo heidelbergensis

(Heidelberg Man) lived from about 500 TYA to about 300 TYA. Also proposed as Homo sapiens heidelbergensis and Homo sapiens paleohungaricus.

Homo sapiens idaltu

Lived from about 160 TYA (proposed subspecies). Is the oldest anatomically modern human known.

Homo floresiensis

From about 12 TYA (announced 2004). Nicknamed hobbit for its small size.

H. neanderthalensis

Lived from about 250 to 30 TYA. Also proposed as Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. There is ongoing debate over whether the "Neanderthal Man" was a separate species, Homo neanderthalensis, or a subspecies of H. sapiens. While the debate remains unsettled, the preponderance of evidence, collected by examining mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomal DNA, currently indicates that there was no gene flow between H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens, and therefore the two were separate species. In 1997 Dr. Mark Stoneking, then an associate professor of anthropology at Penn State University, stated: "These results [based on mitochondrial DNA extracted from Neanderthal bone] indicate that Neanderthals did not contribute mitochondrial DNA to modern humans… Neanderthals are not our ancestors."² Subsequent investigation of a second source of Neanderthal DNA confirmed these findings.³

H. sapiens

Lived from about 200 thousand years ago (TYA) to the present. Between 400,000 years ago and the second interglacial period in the Middle Pleistocene, around 250,000 years ago, the trend in cranial expansion and the elaboration of stone tool technologies developed, providing evidence for a transition from H. erectus to H. sapiens. The direct evidence suggests that there was a migration of H. erectus out of Africa, then a further speciation of H. sapiens from H. erectus in Africa. (There is little evidence that this speciation occurred elsewhere.) Then a subsequent migration within and out of Africa eventually replaced the earlier dispersed H. erectus. However, the current evidence doesn't preclude multiregional speciation, either. This is a hotly debated area in paleoanthropology. "Sapiens" means "wise" or "intelligent."

Additional notes

The origins of humanity have often been a subject of great political and religious controversy. See: creationism.

The classification of humans and their relatives has changed considerably over time. See the history of hominoid taxonomy.

Speculation about the future evolution of humans is often explored in science fiction as continued the speciation of humans as they fill various ecological niches; see adaptive radiation.

References

  1. Wolfgang Enard et al. "Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language." Nature, Vol 418 (22 August 2002) p. 870.
  2. DNA Shows Neandertals Were Not Our Ancestors
  3. Ovchinnikov, et al. "Molecular analysis of Neanderthal DNA from the Northern Caucasus." Nature 404, 490 (2000).

See also

External links

Basic topics in evolutionary biology
Processes of evolution: macroevolution - microevolution - speciation
Mechanisms: selection - genetic drift - gene flow - mutation
Modes: anagenesis - catagenesis - cladogenesis
History: Charles Darwin - The Origin of Species - modern evolutionary synthesis
Subfields: population genetics - ecological genetics - human evolution - molecular evolution - phylogenetics - systematics - evo-devo
List of evolutionary biology topics | Timeline of evolution

See also: Human evolution, Human evolution/Species chart, 1859, 1997, 19th century, 2002