Miscarriage of justice


A miscarriage of justice is primarily the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime that they did not commit. The term can also be applied to errors in the other direction, and to civil cases, but those usages are rarer. Most criminal justice systems have some means to overturn, or "quash", a wrongful conviction, but this is often difficult to achieve. The most serious instances occur when a wrongful conviction is not overturned for several years, or until after the innocent person has been executed or died in jail.

Wrongful conviction or miscarriage of justice can also refer to a conviction reached in an unfair or disputed trial. Wrongful convictions are frequently cited by death penalty opponents as cause to eliminate death penalites to avoid executing innocent persons. In recent years DNA evidence has been used to clear many people falsely convicted.

Contents

General issues

Causes of miscarriages of justice include:

Often, whether a case is in fact a miscarriage of justice remains controversial for a long time. The criminal justice system in most countries is also predisposed against changing its mind, only overturning a wrong conviction when the evidence against the conviction is overwhelming. The result is that many wrongly-convicted people spend many years in jail before their convictions are quashed and they are released.

The risk of miscarriages of justice is one of the main arguments against the death penalty. Where condemned persons are executed promptly after conviction, the most significant effect of a miscarriage of justice is irreversible. (Wrongly-executed people are nevertheless occasionally posthumously pardoned -- which is essentially a null action -- or have their convictions quashed.) Many states that still practice the death penalty now routinely hold condemned persons for ten years or more before execution, to allow time for a miscarriage of justice to be discovered. Even then some innocent people are executed.

Even when a wrongly-convicted person is not executed, spending years in jail often has an effect on the person and his or her family that is irreversible and substantial. With current forms of criminal punishment, it is not possible to reverse the effects of punishment already endured; only the remaining portion of the sentence, including legal disabilities applying to previously-convicted but released persons, can be undone.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom a jailed person whose conviction is quashed is paid compensation for the time they were incarcerated; curiously, a deduction is made from this compensation for food and lodging that they received while in jail.

It is a noted problem that the parole system assumes that all convicted persons are actually guilty, and it poorly handles those who are not. In order to be paroled, a convict is required to sign a document in which, among other things, they confess to the crime for which they were convicted. Some wrongly-convicted people, such as the Birmingham Six, have therefore refused parole, and ended up spending longer in jail than a genuinely guilty person would have.

During the early 1990s there was a series of high-profile cases revealed to have been miscarriages of justice. Many resulted from police fabricating evidence, in order to convict the person they thought was guilty, or simply to convict anyone in order to get a high conviction rate. The West Midlands Serious Crime Squad became notorious for such practices, and was disbanded in 1989. In 1997 the Criminal Cases Review Commission was established specifically in order to examine possible miscarriages of justice. See, for example:

Others include:

Ireland

Australia

Canada

New Zealand

United States of America

France

Soviet Union

Home Secretaries and miscarriage of justice

Several controversial Home Secretaries have been involved in entaglements with the Judiciary personally and professionally.

See also

See also: Miscarriage of justice, 10 Rillington Place, 1894, 1895, 1936, 1949, 1954, 1969, 1973, 1974