Publishing

This article needs to be cleaned up to conform to a higher standard of quality.
See How to Edit and Style and How-to for help, or this article's talk page.

Publishing is the activity of putting information into the public arena. It is relevant to two specific legal issues:

as the process of giving formal notice to the world of a significant intention, e.g. to marry or enter bankruptcy, and
as the essential precondition of being able to claim for defamation, i.e. the alleged libel must have been published.

But this page is concerned with the production of books, magazines, newspapers and other material (whether in printed or electronic format).

Contents

1 The process of publishing

1.1 The content
1.2 The business

2 Academic publishing

3 Tie-in publishing

4 Criticism of the publishing industry

5 References

6 See also

7 External links

The process of publishing

Missing image
AF-Book_Press.jpg

A printing press in Kabul, Afghanistan

A modern book or periodical publishing company (or publisher) is the gateway through which authors must pass to see their work in print (whether hard copy or electronic).

The content

Author/agent submission Publishers spend a significant proportion of their time buying or commissioning content. At a small press, it is possible to survive by relying entirely on commissioned material but, as activity increases, the need for content may outstrip the publisher's established circle of authors and so the door is open for others to submit material for consideration. The majority of unsolicited submissions come from previously unpublished authors. Such manuscripts must go through the slush pile, which acquisitions editors shift through to identify manuscripts of sufficient quality or revenue potential to be referred to the editorial staff. Authors who are represented by literary agents are able to approach the editorial staff directly. Publishers thrive only when it is able to produce and sell books that match the needs of the target readers.
Acceptance/negotiation Once a work is accepted, the commissioning editors then negotiate the purchase of Intellectual Property (IP) rights and agree on royalty rates.
- The authors of traditional printed materials sell exclusive territorial IP Rights that match the list of states in which distribution is proposed (i.e. the rights match the legal systems under which copyright protections can be enforced). In the case of books, the publisher must also agree the intended formats of publication � mass market paperback, trade paperback and hardback are the most common options.
- The situation is slightly more complex if electronic formatting is to be used. Where distribution is to be by CD-R or other physical media, there is no reason to treat this form differently from a hard-copy format and a territorial copyright is an acceptable approach. But the possibility of internet download without the ability to restrict physical distribution within national boundaries presents legal problems that are usually solved by selling language/translation rights rather than territorial rights. Thus, internet access across the European Union is relatively open because of the laws forbidding discriminations based on nationality, but the fact of publication in, say, French, limits the target market to those for whom French is the native language.
- Having agreed the scope of the publication and the formats, the parties must then agree royalty rates, i.e. the percentage of the gross retail price that will be paid to the author. This is a difficult risk management exercise because the publisher must estimate the potential sales in each market and balance projected revenue against production costs.
Editorial stage Once the immediate commercial decisions are taken and the technical legal issues resolved, the author may be asked to improve the quality of the work through rewrite(s) or the in-house staff will edit the work. Almost all publishers operate a house style and staff will copy edit to ensure that the work matches the style and grammatical requirements of each market.
Pre-press When a final text is agreed, the next phases are design (i.e. artwork is commissioned, layout is confirmed, etc.) and preparing the work for printing (i.e. typesetting, dust jacket composition, specification of paper quality, binding method and casing, and proofreading). The activities of typesetting, page layout, the production of negatives, plates from the negatives and, for hardbacks, the preparation of brasses for the spine legend and imprint are now all computerised. The final act before sending the work to the printer is to output the PostScript files. If the target is electronic distribution, the final files are saved as .pdfs (generic Portable Document Format opened by Acrobat) or other formats appropriate to the target operating systems of the hardware used for reading.

The business

The publisher usually controls the advertising and other marketing tasks, but may subcontract various aspects of the process described above. In smaller companies, editing, proof-reading and layout might be done by freelancers. Dedicated in-house sales forces for books are rapidly being replaced by specialised companies who handle sales to bookshops, wholesalers and chain stores for a fee. This trend is accelerating as retail book chains and supermarkets have centralised their buying. If the entire process up to the stage of printing is handled by an outside company or individuals, and then sold to the publishing company, it is known as book packaging. This is a common strategy between smaller publishers in different territorial markets where the company that first buys the IP Rights, sells a package to other publishers and gains an immediate return on capital invested. Indeed, the first publisher will often print sufficient copies for all territories and thereby obtain the maximum quantity discounts on the print run for all.

Any company will maximise its profit margin through vertical integration. Although newspaper and magazine companies still often own printing presses and binderies, book publishers rarely do. Similarly, the trade usually sells the finished products through a distributor who stores and distributes the publisher's wares for a percentage fee or sells on a sale or return basis. The advent of the internet has therefore posed an interesting question to the publishers, the distributors and the retailers. In 2005, Amazon.com announced its purchase of Booksurge, a major Print On Demand (P.O.D) operation. This is probably intended as a preliminary move towards establishing an Amazon imprint. One of the largest bookseller chains, Barnes & Noble, already runs its own successful imprint with both new titles and Classics � hardback editions of out-of-print former best sellers. Similarly, Ingram Book Company, the world�s largest book wholesaler, having flirted with Barnes & Noble, now includes its own P.O.D. division called Lighting Source. From the publishers, Simon & Schuster recently announced that it will start selling its backlist titles directly to consumers through its website. Perseus, one of the largest independent publishers, also announced its purchase of Client Distribution Services, a company that distributes titles by independent publishers. Book clubs are almost entirely direct-to-retail, and niche publishers pursue a mixed strategy to sell through all available outlets � their output is insignificant to the major booksellers and so lost business is no threat to the traditional symbiotic relationships between the four activities of printing, publishing, distribution and retail.

Academic publishing

It was a fact of pre-technology life that, no matter how dedicated, one person can only give a limited number of lectures to the small groups of students who can travel to hear them; and, if articles are to be written and distributed, only a small number of copies can be hand-written or typed. The development of the printing press therefore represented a revolution for communicating the latest hypotheses and research results to the academic community and supplemented what a scholar could do personally. Ironically, this improvement in the efficiency of communication created a challenge for libraries which have had to accommodate the weight and volume of literature. To understand the scale of the problem: about two centuries ago, the number of scientific papers published annually was doubling approximately every fifteen years. Today, the number of published papers doubles about every ten years. But the new reality of internet technology is that it is far cheaper to send out electronic versions of a paper than to have it printed in a journal. Unlike their mediaeval counterparts, modern academics can now run electronic journals and distribute academic materials without the need for publishers. Not surprisingly, publishers perceive this emancipation as a serious threat to their business model. In reality, the interests of scholars and publishers have long been in conflict. The purpose of copyright is to protect the capital invested in the "work" by the publisher and the wish of the scholar is to have the work as widely distributed as possible.

Publishing academic journals and textbooks is a large part of an international industry. The shares of the major publishing companies are listed on national stock exchanges and management policies must satisfy the dividend expectations of international shareholders. Although some specialist academic publishers used to take a less commercial view of their business, the industry has been consolidating and, as smaller units are absorbed into the larger, standardised accounting and profit-oriented policies have come to the fore and now constrain more altruistic leanings.

The rival to this corporate model is Open Access (a.k.a. Author Pays model), i.e. the online distribution of individual articles and academic journals without charge to readers and libraries. Committing to the Open Access community means dispensing with the financial, technical, and legal barriers that have been designed to limit access to academic materials to paying customers.

Corporate interests used to attack the principle of Open Access on quality grounds � it was free, therefore, it could not be any good. Such a challenge would be difficult to defeat if the omission of payment required sacrificing any of the advantages of traditional publishing. But, in reality, no sacrifice is necessary. Because Open Access is just as surely based on peer reviewing as traditional publishing, the quality is the same. More importantly, some sites now include an Open Source element, i.e. academics are allowed to post unreviewed material and the forum community freely comments on the material and interacts with the authors to optimise quality with an efficiency not achieved by traditional publishers. The wikipedia is an example of such a project in a parallel publishing arena. One of the best sources of information on Open Access is: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html.

During 2004, however, many of the traditional publishers (Including e.g. Elsevier, Blackwell Publishing and Springer) introduced their own open access models, which made it possible for authors to decide whether or not their articles should be made freely available. One worry about the open access model is that when the author pays the author also benefits, as opposed to the traditional model in which the readers pay and the readers benefit. Another worry is that good science done by academic institutions who cannot afford to pay for Open Access might not get published at all.

In June 2005 it still remained to be seen whether the Open Access model is in reality a financially viable model when not substantially backed by funding.

Tie-in publishing

Technically, radio, television, cinemas, VCDs and DVDs, music systems, games machines, computer hardware and mobile telephony publish information to those who watch and/or listen. Indeed, the marketing of a major film will require a novelisation, a graphic novel or comic version, the soundtrack album, a game, model, toys and endless promotional publications (including SMS messages). Some of the major publishers have entire divisions devoted to a single fracnchise, e.g. Ballantine Del Rey Lucasbooks has the exclusive rights to Star Wars in the U.S; Randon House UK/Century LucasBooks holds the same rights in the UK. The gaming industry self-publishes through BL Publishing/Black Library (Warhammer) and Wizards of the Coast (DragonLance, Forgotten Realms, etc). The BBC has its own publishing division which does very well with long-running series such as Doctor Who. These multi-media works are cross-marketed aggressively and sales frequently outperform the average stand-alone published work making them a focus of corporate interest.

Criticism of the publishing industry

There has been some controversy in recent times over what is perceived as a crisis in Western publishing. The general complaint is that conglomerates or large corporations have bought and merged a significant number of key publishing houses or bookstores. Consequently, an oligopoly is arising and now exercises more real influence over various aspects of publishing. It is suggested that there has been some reduction in competition but there is no reduction in the number of titles published in the national markets. This is not to deny that consolidation has produced a number of consequences:

the corporations have concentrated on their big name authors, attempting to drive up the market share of bestsellers;
editorial policy now requires imprints to keep fewer authors under contract � this has resulted in economic insecurity for the midlist authors who previously enjoyed stability of employment;
companies now wish to extend the payment schedule for the payment of author royalties � in part this is a response to the demands of the retail trade for extended periods of credit, but it also maximises the amount of circulating capital available to the publisher;
critics claim that these events have led to the following problems:
- not only a loss of diversity in the range of authors published but also to a decline in general quality as all but the most successful authors must have other employment to provide income while writing the work and waiting for the royalties;
- the consolidation of companies has made it easier to impose a political bias on the works published;
- the numbers of independent businesses has declined and thereby the richness and diversity of the works published has been diminshed; and
- there is an excess of transient, non-noteworthy material � an often patronising reference to the mass market for tie-in works and other cultural material labelled low-brow.

Such criticisms have been made over the last hundred years as a part of the general problem of cultural intertia, i.e. a tendency to resist change and either to prefer the status quo or, worse, to embrace a nostalgia for how things used to be (more often than not remembered through rose-tinted spectacles).

References

Schiffrin, Andr� (2000). The Business of Books: How the International Conglomerates Took Over Publishing and Changed the Way We Read.
Epstein, Jason. Book Business: Publishing Past, Present, and Future.
Ugrešić, Dubravka (2003). Thank You for Not Reading.