Register (linguistics)

In linguistics, a register is a subset of a language used for a particular purpose or in a particular social setting. For example, an English speaker may adhere more closely to prescribed grammar, pronounce words ending in -ing with a velar nasal and refrain from using the word "ain't" when speaking in a formal setting, but the same person could violate all of these prescriptions in an informal setting.

The term was first used by the linguist Thomas Bertram Reid in 1956, and brought into general currency in the 1960s by a group of linguists who wanted to distinguish between variations in language according to the user (defined by variables such as social background, geography, sex and age), and variations according to use, “in the sense that each speaker has a range of varieties and chooses between them at different times” (Halliday et al, 1964). The focus is on the way language is used in particular situations, such as legalese or motherese, the language of a biology research lab, of a news report or of the bedroom.

Halliday (1964) identifies three variables that determine register: field (the subject matter of the discourse), tenor (the participants and their relationships) and mode (eg. spoken vs. written English). Any or all the elements of language may vary in different registers — vocabulary, syntax, phonology, morphology, pragmatic rules and/or different paralinguistic features such as pitch, volume and intonation in spoken English, or size and speed of sign production in a sign language. Registers often also have non-linguistic prescriptions such as appropriate dress codes, body language, and proximity of speakers to one another.

As with other types of language variation, we tend to find register continuums rather than discrete varieties — there’s an endless number of registers we could identify, with no clear boundaries to where each one starts and ends. Discourse categorisation is a complex problem, and even in the general definition of ‘register’ given above (language variation defined by use not user), there are cases where other kinds of language variation, such as regional or age dialect, overlap. As a result of this complexity, there is far from consensus about the meanings of terms like ‘register’,‘field’ or ‘tenor’; different writers’ definitions of these terms are often in direct contradiction of each other. Additional terms such as diatype, genre, text type, style, acrolect, mesolect and basilect (to name a few) may be used to cover the same or similar ground. Some prefer to restrict the domain of the term 'register' to a specific vocabulary (Wardhaugh, 1986) (which we might commonly call jargon), while others argue against the use of the term altogether. These various approaches with their own ‘register’ or set of terms and meanings fall under disciplines such as sociolinguistics, stylistics, pragmatics or systemic functional grammar.

Register as formality scale

One of the most analysed areas where the use of language is determined by the situation is the formality scale. Writers (especially in language teaching) have often used the term 'register' as shorthand for formal/informal style, although this is an aging definition. Linguistics textbooks may use the term ‘tenor’ instead (Halliday 1978), but increasingly prefer the term 'style' — “we characterise styles as varieties of language viewed from the point of view of formality” (Trudgill, 1992) — while defining ‘registers’ more narrowly as specialist language use related to a particular activity, such as academic jargon. There is very little agreement as to how the spectrum of formality should be divided.

Formality scale
Very formal, Frozen, Rigid ← FORMAL      Neutral      INFORMAL → Very informal, Casual, Familiar
This diagram is from Quirk et al (1985), who use the term attitude rather than style or register


In one prominent model, Joos (1961) describes five styles in spoken English:


Another suggested division is three-tiered:

R1 (Register one) could display very informal, casual, colloquial expressions, used familiarly. The latest catch phrase, or word expressing an opinion such as 'cool' would be used indiscriminately including words that come into fashion seemingly overnight and leave just as quickly. R1 will also be prone to shortened words, ellipses, incorrect grammar, slang, and vulgarisms. Also likely to include regional variations.

R2 could be described as standard, used in polite circles, educated, equivalent to the language traditionally found in BBC English and falling between the two extremes of R1 and R3.

R3 could be recognised by its formal quality, literary ring, official tone, with a certain archaic quality, the language of scholars and those aware of vocabulary and grammar in use. Correct and always 'looking out' to resist new expressions and using words whose meaning is under review.

It should be noted that the boundaries between the registers are constantly shifting and changing. What is unacceptable today could easily become 'cool' tomorrow!

See also

References

See also: Register (linguistics), 1956, 1960s, Acrolect, Baby talk, Basilect, Body language, Christianese, Creole, Cryptolect