Representable functor

In category theory, a representable functor is a functor of a special form from an arbitrary category into the category of sets. Such functors give representations of an abstract category in terms of known structures (i.e. sets and functions) allowing one to utilize, as much as possible, knowledge about the category of sets in other settings.

Contents

Definition

Let \mathcal C be an arbitrary category and the \mathbf{Set} be the category of sets. For each object A in \mathcal C we define a functor \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A,\;\cdot\;):\mathcal C\rightarrow\mathbf{Set} as follows:

An arbitrary functor F:\mathcal C\rightarrow\mathbf{Set} is said to be 'represented by a pair', (A,φ), where A is an object of \mathcal C and φ is in F(A), if there is a natural isomorphism \Phi:\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A,\;\cdot\;)\rightarrow F, given by the consistent family of bijections \Phi_X:\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A,X)\rightarrow F(X), such that

ΦX(u) = (Fu)(φ) for all u in \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A,X).

It is also common in this case to say that F is 'representable'. Note that φ = ΦA(idA).

A dual set of definitions and statements apply to contravariant functors. Let \mathcal C be an arbitrary category. For each object A in \mathcal C we define a contravariant functor \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(\;\cdot\;,A):\mathcal C\rightarrow\mathbf{Set} as follows:

An arbitrary contravariant functor G:\mathcal C\rightarrow\mathbf{Set} is said to be represented by a pair, (A,φ), where A is an object in \mathcal C and φ is in G(A), if there is a natural isomorphism \Phi:\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(\;\cdot\;,A) \rightarrow G, given by the consistent family of bijections \Phi_X:\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(X,A)\rightarrow G(X), such that

ΦX(u) = (Gu)(φ) for all u in \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(X,A).

Note again that φ = ΦA(idA).

Uniqueness

The representing pair (A,φ) is unique in the following sense. If (A11) and (A22) represent the same functor, then there exists one and only one isomorphism from A1 to A2 so that φ1 in F(A1) maps to φ2 in F(A2). This is because we have the isomorphisms \Phi_1:\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A_1,\;\cdot\;)\rightarrow F and \Phi_2:\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A_2,\;\cdot\;)\rightarrow F and so we have an isomorphism \Phi_2^{-1}\circ\Phi_1:\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A_1,\;\cdot\;)\rightarrow\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A_2,\;\cdot\;). By the Yoneda lemma, A1 is isomorphic to A2 via the isomorphism determined by Φ1 and Φ2, and this maps φ1 to φ2. Uniqueness follows as everything is determined by φ1 and φ2.

Examples

(u in \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathbf{Rng}}(P,B))\mapsto(u(\phi) in | B | ).

Take P=\mathbb Z[T], the polynomial ring in one variable with integer coefficients, and φ = T. Then any ring homomorphism u in \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathbf{Rng}}(\mathbb Z[T],B) is uniquely determined by u(T) = b, where any b in | B | can be used.

Representability and adjoints

The following result shows the relationship between representability of a functor and adjointness.

Proposition: A functor, G:\mathcal C\rightarrow\mathcal D, has a left adjoint if and only if, for every A in \mathcal C, the functor from \mathcal D to Set mapping B to \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal C}(A,G(B)) is representable. If (F(A),φ) represents this functor then F is the object part of a left-adjoint of G for which the isomorphism ΦB is functorial in B and yields the adjointness.

See also

See also: Representable functor, Adjoint functors, Bijection, Category (mathematics), Category of sets, Category theory, Coefficient, Contravariant functor, Dual (category theory), Forgetful functor